ISLAMIC GOVERNANCE MATURITY MODEL: KERANGKA EVALUASI TATA KELOLA ORGANISASI PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70367/1ff91254Keywords:
Islamic governance, maturity model, maqāṣid al-syarī'ah, university governance, quality assurance, accreditationAbstract
The governance of Islamic universities in Indonesia and Muslim-majority countries is still dominated by the Good University Governance (GUG) framework, while Islamic values have generally not been operationalized as a measurable governance component. This condition creates a gap between the ideals of value-based governance and the practice of quality evaluation. This article aims to formulate the Islamic Governance Maturity Model (IGMM), which is an evaluation framework that integrates modern governance principles with maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. The research uses a qualitative approach through systematic literature research and design science logic. The results of the study produced seven main dimensions, namely prophetic leadership, transparency, accountability, participation (syūrā), justice ('adl), sustainable quality, and spiritual governance, which are mapped into five levels of maturity: Unorganized, Reactive, Systematized, Integrated, and Transformative-Maqāṣid. The novelty of this model lies in the operationalization of spiritual values into measurable indicators that support internal evaluation, external assessment, quality assurance, accreditation, and require empirical validation on various typologies of Isla universities.
References
Bhakti, Y. B., Ridwan, A., & Riyadi, R. (2022). Urgensi sistem penjaminan mutu internal & eksternal dalam meningkatkan mutu perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 8(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v8i02.1394
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Duarte, N., & Vardasca, R. (2023). Literature review of accreditation systems in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060582
Hidayah, N., & Ma'arif, S. (2023). Diagnosis tata kelola perguruan tinggi berbasis good university governance. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v7i2.864
Indarti, I., Apriliyani, I. B., & Aljufri, A. (2022). Pengaruh pengendalian internal, good university governance, dan penggunaan teknologi informasi, terhadap kinerja perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetif, 5(3), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.35446/akuntansikompetitif.v5i3.1030
Islamic Financial Services Board. (2021). Guiding principles on Shariah governance systems (IFSB-10 Revised). Islamic Financial Services Board. https://www.ifsb.org/published-standards/
Kamaruddin, S. (2022). Implementasi akad mudharabah dan musyarakah pada teknologi finansial syariah dengan pendekatan kemaslahatan. Al-Mashrafiyah: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-mashrafiyah.v6i1.22075
Kannike, U. M. M., & Fahm, A. O. (2025). Exploring the ethical governance of artificial intelligence from an Islamic ethical perspective. Jurnal Fiqh, 22(1), 134–158. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no1.5
Kantohe, M. S. S., & Sumual, F. M. (2023). Peran sistem pengendalian internal dan komitmen perguruan tinggi dalam mewujudkan good university governance. Jambura Accounting Review, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37905/jar.v4i1.57
Maulidi, M. (2022). Maqasid syariah sebagai filsafat hukum Islam: Sebuah pendekatan sistem menurut Jasser Auda. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 7(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v7i1.2860
Nisa, D., & Aimah, S. (2024). Strategic adaptation in Islamic education quality management: Navigating social developments for sustainable educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Management Research, 3(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v3i2.427
Orgianus, Y., & Khairo Amalia, H. (2024). Islamic values in lecturer competency development: A systematic literature review of trends, frameworks, and impacts in Islamic higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2024.131.69-83
Pham, N., Nguyen, C., Pham, H., & Ta, T. (2022). Internal quality assurance of academic programs: A case study in Vietnamese higher education. SAGE Open, 12, 21582440221144419. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221144419
Pradana, A. A., Putri, I. K., Pinem, L. H., Hartati, S., Prasetya, G., Sari, E. M., & Chaidar, M. (2023). Analisis pencapaian audit mutu internal STIKes Mitra Keluarga rentang 2020–2021. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 9(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v9i01.2401
Ritonga, M., Pristiyono, & Muti'ah, R. (2021). Gambaran penerapan good university governance dan kinerja perguruan tinggi di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu. Ecobisma: Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen, 8(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v8i1.2066
Rizal, S., Pasigai, M. A., Anggoro, M. Y. A. R., Ramlah, R., & Wahyuddin, W. (2023). Implementasi sistem penjaminan mutu internal (SPMI) dalam mewujudkan good university governance (GUG). Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 9(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v9i01.1929
Rosser, A. (2023). Higher education in Indonesia: The political economy of institution-level governance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2021.2010120
Sari, T. D. R., Maisyarah, R., & Purba, R. B. (2024). Penerapan good university governance terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa dengan excellent service sebagai variabel moderasi. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuangan, 4(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v4i2.606
Sunardi, S., Solechan, S., Ubaidillah, U., Waenasae, R., & Kamali, A. N. (2025). The essence of Islamic education: The paradigm of knowledge, faith, and action. Ngaos: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.59373/ngaos.v3i2.220
Tabaghdehi, S. A. H., & Arda, Ö. A. (2025). AI ethics in action: A circular model for transparency, accountability and inclusivity. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2024-0177
Thoha, M., Syawqi, A. H., Yahaya, M. Z., Septiadi, D. D., & Hidayatulloh, M. H. (2023). Can Indonesia's decentralized education technology governance policy: Evidence from Muslim countries. Bestuur, 11(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i2.78320
Verschueren, N., Van Dessel, J., Verslyppe, A., Schoensetters, Y., & Baelmans, M. (2023). A maturity matrix model to strengthen the quality cultures in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020123
Yaya, R., Saud, I. M., Hassan, M. K., & Rashid, M. (2021). Governance of profit and loss sharing financing in achieving socio-economic justice. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(6), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2017-0161
Zafar, M. B., & Ali, H. (2025). Shariah governance standard on generative AI for Islamic financial institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5143165
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Moh Ali, Encep Darisman, Sasikirana Rizky Ramadhania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
